Learn
The retirement bucket strategy, explained plainly.
A retirement bucket strategy divides your savings into groups based on when you expect to spend the money. Near-term buckets hold steadier investments to cover income, while later buckets stay invested for growth. The idea is to avoid selling growth investments after a market drop. It does not remove market risk or guarantee any result.
The usual version
How the three buckets usually work
Bucket 1: near-term spending
Holds the money you expect to need over roughly the next few years, usually in cash and other stable holdings. Its job is to pay your bills so a market drop does not force you to sell something at a bad moment.
The trade-off: Stable holdings may not keep pace with inflation, so a bucket that is too large can quietly cost you purchasing power.
Bucket 2: the middle years
Holds money for the years after that, usually in more conservative income-oriented investments. It is the bridge, and it often refills Bucket 1 as that money is spent.
The trade-off: It can still lose value in a rough market, and it does not stay full by itself. Someone has to decide when and how to refill it.
Bucket 3: long-term growth
Holds money you will not touch for a decade or more, invested for growth. Because it has time, it can ride out swings that the earlier buckets are built to avoid.
The trade-off: Growth investments can decline sharply, and a long horizon does not guarantee recovery. It takes discipline to leave this bucket alone when markets are down.
How the three buckets work together
Money is sorted by when you expect to spend it. Income comes out of the first bucket, and each later bucket is meant to refill the one before it.
Diagram. Your income is paid from Bucket 1, near-term spending. Bucket 2, the middle years, refills Bucket 1. Bucket 3, long-term growth, refills Bucket 2.
When markets are steady or rising
- Bucket 1 pays your income.
- Bucket 2 may refill Bucket 1 as it runs down.
- Gains in Bucket 3 may be used to top up Bucket 2, ideally while prices are favorable.
The limit: Refilling still means selling something, which can create taxes in a taxable account, and "favorable" is only known in hindsight.
When markets fall
- Bucket 1 keeps paying income, so you may not need to sell growth investments at lower prices.
- Refills from Bucket 3 may be paused while it recovers.
- Bucket 2 may bridge the gap in the meantime.
The limit: If the downturn lasts longer than Buckets 1 and 2 can cover, you may still have to sell growth investments at a loss. Recovery is never guaranteed.
Illustration only, not to scale. Bucket sizes, timing and holdings vary from person to person. This is not a recommendation or a projection, and it does not show or imply any result.
Our approach
How the Next Phase Plan compares
| Common three-bucket approach | Next Phase Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| How many groups | Commonly three | Six five-year segments covering about thirty years |
| How they are sized | Often by a rule of thumb, such as a number of years of spending | Built from the gap between what you want to spend and what Social Security or a pension already covers |
| How refilling works | Varies by who sets it up, and is sometimes left unwritten | Planned deliberately, often in good years, rather than at whatever price the market offers |
| Who it is built around | A general pattern many people can follow | Your household, your timeline and your income needs |
Putting the near-term years in steadier holdings and the distant years in growth investments is meant to reduce the chance that a bad market early in retirement forces you to sell at a loss. The limit is that a segment plan does not stop markets from falling, and the later segments can still lose value.
You can see how each of the six segments is built, and what job each one does, in How the segments work. To see why selling during a downturn can matter so much once you are withdrawing, read The volatility tax.
Fit and limits
Who a bucket approach may suit, and where it may fall short
It may suit
- People close to retirement who are worried about selling investments during a downturn to pay the bills.
- People who want to see where next year's income is coming from, which may make it easier to stay with a plan when markets are rough.
- People who prefer a structure with a written refill plan to a single blended portfolio and a withdrawal percentage.
Where it may fall short
- Refilling takes discipline
- A bucket plan only works if refills actually happen. If markets are down when a bucket runs low, you may still face a choice between selling at a loss and letting the near-term bucket run thin.
- Inflation works against the safe buckets
- The more you hold in stable investments, the more inflation may erode what they can buy over a long retirement. Too little growth can be a risk of its own.
- Behavior can undo the structure
- Having a bucket for next year's income may make a downturn easier to sit through, but it will not stop anyone from abandoning the plan in a panic. A plan you cannot hold is not a plan.
- Refilling can create taxes
- Selling investments in a taxable account to refill a bucket may trigger capital gains, and withdrawals from pre-tax accounts are generally taxed as ordinary income. Which account funds which bucket matters, and a tax professional should look at your situation.
- It is not a free lunch
- Research is mixed on whether a bucket approach produces more money than a single total-return portfolio. What it changes is when you sell, not whether markets can fall.
This page is educational and is not personalized advice. Every strategy involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Whether a bucket or segment approach is appropriate depends on your own circumstances, and tax treatment depends on your situation.
Questions
Common questions
The 3 bucket retirement strategy splits savings by when the money will be spent: near-term cash needs, the middle years, and long-term growth. The near-term bucket pays your income so you are not forced to sell growth investments after a market drop. It does not remove risk, and it depends on refilling the buckets over time.
It can help some people stay with a plan, because next year's income is already set aside. Research is mixed on whether it produces more money than a single diversified portfolio. It does not guarantee an outcome, and the results depend on how the buckets are sized, refilled and taxed.
There is no single right split. A common starting point is to size the near-term bucket to cover several years of the spending that Social Security and other steady income do not. The right amounts depend on your spending, your other income, your timeline and your comfort with risk.
They are close relatives. Both divide money by when it will be spent. Time segmentation, as we use it in the Next Phase Plan, uses consecutive five-year segments built around your own income gap rather than a general rule. Neither removes market risk or guarantees an outcome.
Want to see how this would work for your numbers?
That is what the first conversation is. Thirty minutes to see where your income could come from, and whether a segmented plan fits. If we are not the right fit, we will tell you.